Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E3-1276 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E3-1276 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E3-1276 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700T

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 84W, a 49W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1276 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,517 vs 7,543).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 35.4 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $213 MSRP).

Xeon E3-1276 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($213 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅Delivers 42.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.4 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($213 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌140% higher power demand at 84W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1276 v3 better than Core i7-7700T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1276 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1276 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1276 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1276 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1276 v3 comes in $90 cheaper on MSRP at $213 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 42.7% better value on MSRP (35.4 vs 24.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E3-1276 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700T

The Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,517 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E3-1276 v3

The Xeon E3-1276 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,543 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700T and Xeon E3-1276 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700T versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1276 v3 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1276 v3 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-7700T is built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-7700T scores 7,517 against the Xeon E3-1276 v3's 7,543 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E3-1276 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700T vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E3-1276 v3.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Xeon E3-1276 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	—
PassMark	7,517	7,543
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,605	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,066	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,643	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Xeon E3-1276 v3
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-7700T) / not specified (Xeon E3-1276 v3). The Core i7-7700T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Xeon E3-1276 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 630	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	Yes	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7700T was priced at $303, while the Xeon E3-1276 v3 came in at $213. On launch pricing ($303 vs $213), Xeon E3-1276 v3 was $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700T delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 35.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1276 v3 — making the Xeon E3-1276 v3 the 35.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP	$303	$213-30%
Performance per Dollar	24.8	35.4+43%
Release Date	2017	2014

Search Core i7-7700T on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1276 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.