Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-1630 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-1630 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-1630 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700T

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-1630 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-1630 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,517 vs 7,561).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon E5-1630 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-1630 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1630 v4 better than Core i7-7700T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-1630 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-1630 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1630 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1630 v4 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-1630 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-7700T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (24.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-1630 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7700T

The Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,517 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon E5-1630 v4

The Xeon E5-1630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,561 points. Launch price was $406.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700T and Xeon E5-1630 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700T versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v4 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1630 v4 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-7700T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700T scores 7,517 against the Xeon E5-1630 v4's 7,561 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-1630 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700T vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-1630 v4.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Xeon E5-1630 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4 GHz+5%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.7 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	7,517	7,561
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,605	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,066	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,643	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-7700T	Xeon E5-1630 v4
Socket	LGA1151	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-7700T) / not specified (Xeon E5-1630 v4). The Core i7-7700T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-1630 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.