Core i7-7700T
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2630 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-7700T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $766 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 254.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 7.0 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $1,069 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2630 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2630 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (3,643 vs 3,654).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2630 v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2630 v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,069 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2630 v2 better than Core i7-7700T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2630 v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-7700T
The Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,517 points. Launch price was $303.
Xeon E5-2630 v2
The Xeon E5-2630 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,490 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7700T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700T versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-7700T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700T scores 7,517 against the Xeon E5-2630 v2's 7,490 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-7700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,066 vs 549, a 64% lead for the Core i7-7700T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,643 vs 3,654 (0.3% advantage for the Xeon E5-2630 v2). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700T vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2630 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-7700T | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+23% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+12% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 7,517 | 7,490 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,605 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,066+94% | 549 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,643 | 3,654 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700T versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — the Core i7-7700T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-7700T) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2630 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-7700T) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2630 v2) — the Xeon E5-2630 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B150,Q170,B250,Q250,H110,H170,Z170,H270,Z270 (Core i7-7700T) and C602,C600 (Xeon E5-2630 v2).
| Feature | Core i7-7700T | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+50% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 768 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 40+150% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-7700T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2630 v2). The Core i7-7700T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v2 targets Server.
| Feature | Core i7-7700T | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-7700T was priced at $303, while the Xeon E5-2630 v2 came in at $1069. On launch pricing ($303 vs $1069), Core i7-7700T was $766 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7700T delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 7.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2630 v2 — making the Core i7-7700T the 111.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7700T | Xeon E5-2630 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $303-72% | $1069 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8+254% | 7.0 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-7700T and Xeon E5-2630 v2
