Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

Intel

Core i7-7700T

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v4

4 Cores8 Thrd135 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2637 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7700T

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2637 v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $303 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

2016

Why buy it

  • +25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (7,460 vs 7,517).
  • 285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7700T better than Xeon E5-2637 v4?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2637 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-7700T is the better buy right now. Core i7-7700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $303 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-7700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-7700T

The Core i7-7700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,517 points. Launch price was $303.

Intel

Xeon E5-2637 v4

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,460 points. Launch price was $996.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700T and Xeon E5-2637 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700T versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v4 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700T (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-7700T uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700T scores 7,517 against the Xeon E5-2637 v4's 7,460 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-7700T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700T vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2637 v4.

FeatureCore i7-7700TXeon E5-2637 v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+3%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.5 GHz+21%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
10 MB+25%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+25500%
1 MB
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
7,517
7,460
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,605
Geekbench 6 Single
1,066
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,643
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-7700TXeon E5-2637 v4
Socket
LGA1151
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-7700T) / not specified (Xeon E5-2637 v4). The Core i7-7700T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i7-7700TXeon E5-2637 v4
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes