Core i7-860
VS
Opteron X3418

Core i7-860 vs Opteron X3418

Intel

Core i7-860

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Opteron X3418

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-860 is positioned at rank 986 and the Opteron X3418 is on rank 115, so the Opteron X3418 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-860

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29407%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27787%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20175%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6078%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4814%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4212%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2412%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2381%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2168%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2168%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2143%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2085%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2056%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2048%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2029%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
96%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
100%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
100%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
99%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
98%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
98%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
97%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
97%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
96%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
96%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
95%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
95%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron X3418

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2732%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
516%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
458%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
354%
#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
97%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
96%
#115
Opteron X3418
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Opteron X3418 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-860Opteron X3418
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Excavator (2017−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-860 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-860Opteron X3418
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-860 and Opteron X3418

Intel

Core i7-860

The Core i7-860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,011 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Opteron X3418

The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-860 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Opteron X3418's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-860 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-860 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Opteron X3418 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-860 scores 3,011 against the Opteron X3418's 3,043 — a 1.1% lead for the Opteron X3418.

FeatureCore i7-860Opteron X3418
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz+8%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+56%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark
3,011
3,043+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-860 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron X3418 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-860Opteron X3418
Socket
LGA1156
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%