Core i7-870
VS
Core i5-6260U

Core i7-870 vs Core i5-6260U

Intel

Core i7-870

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i5-6260U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-870 is positioned at rank 987 and the Core i5-6260U is on rank 406, so the Core i5-6260U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-870

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29546%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27918%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20271%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6107%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4837%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4232%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2424%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2392%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2178%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2178%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2153%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2095%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2066%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2058%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2039%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
97%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
100%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
99%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
97%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
97%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
97%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
96%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
96%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
95%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
92%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6260U

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
98%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
550%
#395
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
542%
#396
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
498%
#397
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
495%
#398
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
491%
#400
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
474%
#401
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
455%
#402
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
454%
#403
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
442%
#406
Core i5-6260U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-6260U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-870Core i5-6260U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-870 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-870Core i5-6260U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($80)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-870 and Core i5-6260U

Intel

Core i7-870

The Core i7-870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,164 points. Launch price was $305.

Intel

Core i5-6260U

The Core i5-6260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,200 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The Core i7-870 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-6260U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-870 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-870 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-6260U — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-870 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-870 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-6260U uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-870 scores 3,164 against the Core i5-6260U's 3,200 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-6260U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 476 vs 979, a 69.1% lead for the Core i5-6260U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-870 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-6260U.

FeatureCore i7-870Core i5-6260U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+24%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.93 GHz+63%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+100%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
3,164
3,200+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
476
979+106%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,541
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-870 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-6260U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-870 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i5-6260U — the Core i5-6260U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-6260U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-870) vs 12 (Core i5-6260U) — the Core i7-870 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i7-870) and Skylake-U (Core i5-6260U).

FeatureCore i7-870Core i5-6260U
Socket
LGA1156
BGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-870) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-6260U). The Core i5-6260U includes integrated graphics (Iris Graphics 540), while the Core i7-870 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-870 targets Legacy Desktop, Core i5-6260U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-6260U rivals A12-9720P.

FeatureCore i7-870Core i5-6260U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Iris Graphics 540
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
Mainstream Laptop