Core i7-8750H vs Xeon D-1718T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon D-1718T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon D-1718T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8750H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 46W, a 1W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-1718T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon D-1718T

2022

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8750H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,674 vs 9,769).
❌Launch MSRP is still $302 MSRP, while Core i7-8750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8750H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8750H better than Xeon D-1718T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1718T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8750H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-8750H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8750H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-8750H is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i7-8750H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $302 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon D-1718T only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 11.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1718T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon D-1718T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8750H

The Core i7-8750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,769 points. Launch price was $395.

Xeon D-1718T

The Xeon D-1718T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,674 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8750H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1718T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-8750H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8750H versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1718T — a 15.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-8750H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-8750H is built on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-8750H scores 9,769 against the Xeon D-1718T's 9,674 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-8750H. L3 cache: 9 MB on the Core i7-8750H vs 10 MB on the Xeon D-1718T.

Feature	Core i7-8750H	Xeon D-1718T
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+17%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	9 MB	10 MB+11%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	—
PassMark	9,769	9,674
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8750H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1718T uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8750H versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-1718T — the Xeon D-1718T supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-1718T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i7-8750H	Xeon D-1718T
Socket	BGA1440	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	256 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon D-1718T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-8750H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-1718T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8750H targets Mobile, Xeon D-1718T targets Server/Edge.