Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2650 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2650 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2650 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8750H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2650 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,769 vs 9,795).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2650 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+122.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8750H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650 v2 better than Core i7-8750H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2650 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8750H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2650 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 122.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 9 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2650 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-8750H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2650 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8750H

The Core i7-8750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,769 points. Launch price was $395.

Xeon E5-2650 v2

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,795 points. Launch price was $650.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8750H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8750H versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 — a 18.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-8750H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-8750H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8750H scores 9,769 against the Xeon E5-2650 v2's 9,795 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v2. L3 cache: 9 MB on the Core i7-8750H vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v2.

Feature	Core i7-8750H	Xeon E5-2650 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+21%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz+18%
L3 Cache	9 MB	20 MB (total)+122%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	9,769	9,795

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8750H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8750H versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 — the Core i7-8750H supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-8750H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-8750H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v2) — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-8750H	Xeon E5-2650 v2
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+43%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8750H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2650 v2). The Core i7-8750H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8750H targets Mobile.