Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2690

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-8750H

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2690 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (9 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2690, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2690

2012

Why buy it

✅+122.2% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 9 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅150% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,764 vs 9,769).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,057 MSRP, while Core i7-8750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-8750H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8750H better than Xeon E5-2690?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2690 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-8750H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-8750H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-8750H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-8750H is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2690 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-8750H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,057 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2690 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (4.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-8750H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-8750H vs Xeon E5-2690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-8750H

The Core i7-8750H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB. L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,769 points. Launch price was $395.

Xeon E5-2690

The Xeon E5-2690 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,764 points. Launch price was $397.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-8750H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2690 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2690 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-8750H versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2690 — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-8750H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-8750H uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8750H scores 9,769 against the Xeon E5-2690's 9,764 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-8750H. L3 cache: 9 MB on the Core i7-8750H vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2690.

Feature	Core i7-8750H	Xeon E5-2690
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+8%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.9 GHz+32%
L3 Cache	9 MB	20480 kB (total)+122%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	9,769	9,764

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-8750H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2690 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-8750H versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-2690 — the Core i7-8750H supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2690 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-8750H) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2690). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-8750H) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2690) — the Xeon E5-2690 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-8750H	Xeon E5-2690
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+67%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	384 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	40+150%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-8750H) / not specified (Xeon E5-2690). The Core i7-8750H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2690 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-8750H targets Mobile.