Core i7-875K vs FX-4350

Core i7-875K vs FX-4350 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-875K

4 / 8

3,177

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

3,184

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-875K vs FX-4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-875K vs FX-4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-875K

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-4350 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,177 vs 3,184).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 26.1 PassMark/$ ($353 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-4350.

FX-4350

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $353 MSRP).
✅Delivers 190.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $353 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-875K.

Trade-offs

❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-4350 better than Core i7-875K?

Yes. FX-4350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-4350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-4350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-4350 is the better buy right now. FX-4350 comes in $231 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $353 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 190.0% better value on MSRP (26.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-4350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-875K vs FX-4350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-875K

The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.

FX-4350

The FX-4350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,184 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-875K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-4350's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-4350 — a 17.7% clock advantage for the FX-4350 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-875K uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-4350 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-875K scores 3,177 against the FX-4350's 3,184 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-4350.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-4350
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.3 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.93 GHz	4.2 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	3,177	3,184
Geekbench 6 Single	—	504
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,289

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-875K uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-4350 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-875K versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-4350 — the FX-4350 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The FX-4350 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-4350
Socket	LGA1156	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1866+40%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-875K) vs AMD-V (FX-4350). Primary use case: Core i7-875K targets Desktop, FX-4350 targets Gaming.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-4350
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-875K was priced at $353, while the FX-4350 came in at $122. On launch pricing ($353 vs $122), FX-4350 was $231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-875K delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 26.1 pts/$ for the FX-4350 — making the FX-4350 the 97.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-4350
MSRP	$353	$122-65%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	26.1+190%
Release Date	2010	2013

Search Core i7-875K on Amazon

Search FX-4350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.