Core i7-875K vs FX-770K

Core i7-875K vs FX-770K Performance Spectrum

Core i7-875K

4 / 8

3,177

+0.2%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

3,172

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-875K vs FX-770K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-875K vs FX-770K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-875K

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $353 MSRP, while FX-770K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

FX-770K

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,172 vs 3,177).

Quick Answers

So, is FX-770K better than Core i7-875K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-770K is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-875K pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-875K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-770K is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-770K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $353 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-875K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (9.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-770K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-875K vs FX-770K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-875K

The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.

FX-770K

The FX-770K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,172 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-875K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-770K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-770K — a 8% clock advantage for the FX-770K (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-875K uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-770K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-875K scores 3,177 against the FX-770K's 3,172 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-875K.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-770K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.93 GHz	3.5 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4 MB+1500%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,177	3,172

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-875K uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-770K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-770K
Socket	LGA1156	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-875K) / not specified (FX-770K). Primary use case: Core i7-875K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-770K
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-875K was priced at $353, while the FX-770K came in at $0. On launch pricing ($353 vs $0), FX-770K was $353 cheaper.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-770K
MSRP	$353	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	—
Release Date	2010	2014

Search Core i7-875K on Amazon

Search FX-770K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.