Core i7-875K vs FX-7500

Core i7-875K vs FX-7500 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-875K

4 / 8

3,177

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T2390

3,209

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-875K vs FX-7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-875K vs FX-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-875K

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,177 vs 3,209).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 32.1 PassMark/$ ($353 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 95W vs 19W.
❌No integrated graphics, while FX-7500 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

FX-7500

2014

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $253 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $353 MSRP).
✅Delivers 256.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $353 MSRP).
✅Draws 19W instead of 95W, a 76W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i7-875K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-875K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-7500 better than Core i7-875K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-875K is ahead with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, FX-7500 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-7500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-7500 is the better buy right now. FX-7500 comes in $253 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $353 MSRP, and it still gives you 1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-875K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 256.6% better value on MSRP (32.1 vs 9.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-7500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-875K vs FX-7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-875K

The Core i7-875K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,177 points. Launch price was $486.

FX-7500

The FX-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,209 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-875K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-7500's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-875K versus 3.3 GHz on the FX-7500 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-875K (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-875K uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-7500 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-875K scores 3,177 against the FX-7500's 3,209 — a 1% lead for the FX-7500.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-7500
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.93 GHz+40%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,177	3,209+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-875K uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-7500 uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-875K versus DDR3-1600 on the FX-7500 — the FX-7500 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-875K) vs 8 (FX-7500) — the Core i7-875K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-7500
Socket	LGA1156	FP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-875K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-875K) vs AMD-V (FX-7500). The FX-7500 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-875K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-875K targets Desktop, FX-7500 targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-7500
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon R7
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-875K was priced at $353, while the FX-7500 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($353 vs $100), FX-7500 was $253 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-875K delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 32.1 pts/$ for the FX-7500 — making the FX-7500 the 112.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-875K	FX-7500
MSRP	$353	$100-72%
Performance per Dollar	9.0	32.1+257%
Release Date	2010	2014

Search Core i7-875K on Amazon

Search FX-7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.