
Core i7-940

Phenom II X6 1035T
Core i7-940 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-940 vs Phenom II X6 1035T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-940 vs Phenom II X6 1035T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-940
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $562 MSRP, while Phenom II X6 1035T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X6 1035T.
Phenom II X6 1035T
2010Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i7-940.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-940 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,012 vs 3,029).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-940 better than Phenom II X6 1035T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-940 vs Phenom II X6 1035T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-940
The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.

Phenom II X6 1035T
The Phenom II X6 1035T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 April 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,012 points. Launch price was $189.
Processing Power
The Core i7-940 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1035T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1035T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 versus 3.1 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1035T — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-940 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-940 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1035T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940 scores 3,029 against the Phenom II X6 1035T's 3,012 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-940. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-940 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1035T.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Phenom II X6 1035T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz+13% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,029 | 3,012 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 2,670 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-940 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X6 1035T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-940 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X6 1035T — the Phenom II X6 1035T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Core i7-940) vs 2 (Phenom II X6 1035T).
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Phenom II X6 1035T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 24 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 36 | — |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X6 1035T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-940) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X6 1035T). Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop, Phenom II X6 1035T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Phenom II X6 1035T rivals Core i5-750.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Phenom II X6 1035T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















