Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8750B

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8750B Performance Spectrum

Core i7-940

4 / 8

3,029

0.0%

3,058

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8750B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-940

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 95W, a 94W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,029 vs 3,058).
❌Launch MSRP is still $562 MSRP, while PRO A10-8750B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A10-8750B

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌9400% higher power demand at 95W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8750B better than Core i7-940?

Yes. PRO A10-8750B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8750B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8750B is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8750B is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A10-8750B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $562 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-940 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1366.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8750B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8750B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-940

The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.

PRO A10-8750B

The PRO A10-8750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,058 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-940 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-8750B's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 versus 4 GHz on the PRO A10-8750B — a 22.2% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8750B (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-940 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the PRO A10-8750B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940 scores 3,029 against the PRO A10-8750B's 3,058 — a 1% lead for the PRO A10-8750B.

Feature	Core i7-940	PRO A10-8750B
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	4 GHz+25%
Base Clock	2.93 GHz	3.6 GHz+23%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,029	3,058

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-940 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-8750B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.