
Core i7-940

Pentium G4600T
Core i7-940 vs Pentium G4600T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-940 vs Pentium G4600T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-940 vs Pentium G4600T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-940
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,029 vs 3,062).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
Pentium G4600T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $487 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 657.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.8 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-940 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G4600T better than Core i7-940?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-940 vs Pentium G4600T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-940
The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.

Pentium G4600T
The Pentium G4600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,062 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Core i7-940 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G4600T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-940 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G4600T — a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-940 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-940 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G4600T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940 scores 3,029 against the Pentium G4600T's 3,062 — a 1.1% lead for the Pentium G4600T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-940 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G4600T.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Pentium G4600T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz | 3 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,029 | 3,062+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-940 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G4600T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Pentium G4600T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 24 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 3 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 36 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-940) / not specified (Pentium G4600T). Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Pentium G4600T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-940 was priced at $562, while the Pentium G4600T came in at $75. On launch pricing ($562 vs $75), Pentium G4600T was $487 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-940 delivers 5.4 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G4600T — making the Pentium G4600T the 153.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-940 | Pentium G4600T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $562 | $75-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 40.8+656% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














