Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8770E

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8770E Performance Spectrum

Core i7-940

4 / 8

3,029

+0.9%

3,001

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8770E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8770E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-940

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (36 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $395 MSRP).

PRO A10-8770E

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $167 less on MSRP ($395 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.6 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($395 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-940 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,001 vs 3,029).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-940 better than PRO A10-8770E?

Yes. Core i7-940 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-940 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-940 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-940 is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-940 comes in 42.3% more expensive on MSRP at $562 MSRP versus $395 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. PRO A10-8770E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 3,001 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8770E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-940 vs PRO A10-8770E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-940

The Core i7-940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,029 points. Launch price was $299.

PRO A10-8770E

The PRO A10-8770E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,001 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-940 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the PRO A10-8770E's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-940 versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-8770E — a 9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8770E (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-940 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the PRO A10-8770E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-940 scores 3,029 against the PRO A10-8770E's 3,001 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-940.

Feature	Core i7-940	PRO A10-8770E
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.93 GHz+5%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Bloomfield (2008−2010)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,029	3,001

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-940 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A10-8770E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-940	PRO A10-8770E
Socket	LGA1366	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	24 GB	—
RAM Channels	3	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	36	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-940) / not specified (PRO A10-8770E). Primary use case: Core i7-940 targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-940	PRO A10-8770E
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-940 was priced at $562, while the PRO A10-8770E came in at $395. On launch pricing ($562 vs $395), PRO A10-8770E was $167 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-940 delivers 5.4 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the PRO A10-8770E — making the PRO A10-8770E the 34% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-940	PRO A10-8770E
MSRP	$562	$395-30%
Performance per Dollar	5.4	7.6+41%
Release Date	2008	2016

Search Core i7-940 on Amazon

Search PRO A10-8770E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.