Core i7-965 vs A10 PRO-7850B
Core i7-965
A10 PRO-7850B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-965 is positioned at rank 1086 and the A10 PRO-7850B is on rank 1027, so the A10 PRO-7850B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-965
Performance Per Dollar A10 PRO-7850B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-965 | A10 PRO-7850B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($140) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-965 | A10 PRO-7850B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+248%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($140) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-965 and A10 PRO-7850B
Core i7-965
The Core i7-965 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Novembro 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,424 points. Launch price was $1,509.
A10 PRO-7850B
The A10 PRO-7850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,441 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-965 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10 PRO-7850B's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-965 versus 4 GHz on the A10 PRO-7850B — a 14.5% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7850B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-965 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10 PRO-7850B uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-965 scores 3,424 against the A10 PRO-7850B's 3,441 — a 0.5% lead for the A10 PRO-7850B.
| Feature | Core i7-965 | A10 PRO-7850B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz | 4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,424 | 3,441 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 470 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-965 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10 PRO-7850B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-965 | A10 PRO-7850B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-965) / AMD-V (A10 PRO-7850B). The A10 PRO-7850B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-965 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7850B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7850B rivals Core i5-4590.
| Feature | Core i7-965 | A10 PRO-7850B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon R7 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Business Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-965 launched at $1000 MSRP, while the A10 PRO-7850B debuted at $426. At current prices ($40 vs $140), the Core i7-965 is $100 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-965 delivers 85.6 pts/$ vs 24.6 pts/$ for the A10 PRO-7850B — making the Core i7-965 the 110.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-965 | A10 PRO-7850B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1000 | $426-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-71% | $140 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.6+248% | 24.6 |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-965 and A10 PRO-7850B
