
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core i7-10700T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌8.5% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$355 MSRP
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Core i7-10700T
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($355 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,891 vs 14,397).
Core i7-9700K
2018Core i7-10700T
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($355 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌8.5% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$355 MSRP
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,891 vs 14,397).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core i7-10700T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 95 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 322 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core i7-10700T

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i7-10700T
Core i7-10700T
The Core i7-10700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2020 (5 years ago). It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 12,891 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i7-10700T's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i7-10700T — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core i7-10700T's 12,891 — a 11% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i7-10700T.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+9% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 14,397+12% | 12,891 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,531 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,814 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10700T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and LGA1200 (Core i7-10700T).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-10700T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core i7-10700T debuted at $355. On MSRP ($385 vs $355), the Core i7-10700T is $30 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 36.3 pts/$ for the Core i7-10700T — making the Core i7-9700K the 2.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core i7-10700T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $355-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+3% | 36.3 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












