
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 164U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 164U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 164U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,625 vs 14,397).
Core i7-9700K
2018Core Ultra 7 164U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 164U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 164U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,625 vs 14,397).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Core Ultra 7 164U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 316 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core Ultra 7 164U

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U
The Core Ultra 7 164U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 12,625 points. Launch price was $448.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 164U offers 12 cores / 14 threads — the Core Ultra 7 164U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 164U — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 164U uses Meteor Lake-U (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core Ultra 7 164U's 12,625 — a 13.1% lead for the Core i7-9700K. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 14+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+227% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Meteor Lake-U (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397+14% | 12,625 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,766 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,131 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,973 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 164U uses FCBGA2551 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus LPDDR5x-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 164U — the Core Ultra 7 164U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 12 (Core Ultra 7 164U) — the Core i7-9700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Meteor Lake-U (Core Ultra 7 164U).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA2551 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5x-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel Arc (Core Ultra 7 164U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 7 164U targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 164U rivals Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 164U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Arc |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Enthusiast |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












