
Core i9-10850K

Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10850K
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $346 less on MSRP ($453 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.5 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($453 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,964 vs 22,066).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10850K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 48.5 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $453 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10850K better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10850K
The Core i9-10850K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 21,964 points. Launch price was $453.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10850K packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10850K versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10850K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-10850K uses the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10850K scores 21,964 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10850K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 12 / 24+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+34% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-S (2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,964 | 22,066 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10850K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10850K was priced at $453, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 came in at $799. On launch pricing ($453 vs $799), Core i9-10850K was $346 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10850K delivers 48.5 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Core i9-10850K the 54.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1920 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $453-43% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.5+76% | 27.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














