Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Core i9-10850K
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10850K
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-S (2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10850K and Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Core i9-10850K
The Core i9-10850K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 21,964 points. Launch price was $453.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10850K packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10850K versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-10850K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-10850K uses the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10850K scores 21,964 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10850K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+59% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 32 MB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-S (2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,964 | 22,077 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,780 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10850K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-10850K) / AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10850K launched at $453 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 debuted at $999. At current prices ($300 vs $300), the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10850K delivers 73.2 pts/$ vs 73.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — making the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 the 0.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10850K | Ryzen Threadripper 1950 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $453-55% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.2 | 73.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-10850K and Ryzen Threadripper 1950
