
Core i9-10880H

Xeon W-1250P
Core i9-10880H vs Xeon W-1250P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10880H vs Xeon W-1250P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10880H vs Xeon W-1250P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10880H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,240 vs 14,259).
Xeon W-1250P
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10880H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $311 MSRP, while Core i9-10880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1250P better than Core i9-10880H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10880H vs Xeon W-1250P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10880H
The Core i9-10880H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,240 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-1250P
The Xeon W-1250P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,259 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10880H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1250P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10880H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10880H versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1250P — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-10880H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core i9-10880H is built on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-10880H scores 14,240 against the Xeon W-1250P's 14,259 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-1250P. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Core i9-10880H vs 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon W-1250P.
| Feature | Core i9-10880H | Xeon W-1250P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 4.1 GHz+78% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+33% | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | — |
| PassMark | 14,240 | 14,259 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10880H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1250P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10880H | Xeon W-1250P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













