Core i9-10880H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS

Core i9-10880H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10880H

8 / 16

14,240

0.0%

14,349

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10880H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10880H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10880H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,240 vs 14,349).

Ryzen 5 4600HS

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10880H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10880H better than Ryzen 5 4600HS?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10880H is ahead with a 29.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600HS pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i9-10880H also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10880H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-10880H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 29.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 4600HS is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i9-10880H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10880H

The Core i9-10880H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,240 points. Launch price was $149.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10880H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10880H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10880H versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10880H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-10880H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10880H scores 14,240 against the Ryzen 5 4600HS's 14,349 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600HS. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Core i9-10880H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS.

Feature	Core i9-10880H	Ryzen 5 4600HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+27%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3 GHz+30%
L3 Cache	16 MB+100%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	14,240	14,349

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10880H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.