Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10885H

8 / 16

14,448

+0.7%

14,349

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10885H

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10885H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,349 vs 14,448).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10885H better than Ryzen 5 4600HS?

Yes. Core i9-10885H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 28.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10885H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 28.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10885H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10885H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-10885H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 28.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-10885H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-10885H vs Ryzen 5 4600HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10885H

The Core i9-10885H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,448 points. Launch price was $556.

Ryzen 5 4600HS

The Ryzen 5 4600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 14,349 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10885H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10885H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10885H versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600HS — a 24.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10885H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-10885H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS uses Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10885H scores 14,448 against the Ryzen 5 4600HS's 14,349 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10885H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i9-10885H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600HS.

Feature	Core i9-10885H	Ryzen 5 4600HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+27%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	7 nm-50%
Architecture	Comet Lake-H (2020)	Renoir-HS (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark	14,448	14,349

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10885H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.