
Core i9-10940X

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10940X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+39.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $215 less on MSRP ($784 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.3 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($784 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 180W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 48.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,040 vs 1,450).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,000 vs 11,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 35.3 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $784 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10940X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10940X
The Core i9-10940X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,684 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10940X packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10940X versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10940X (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-10940X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10940X scores 27,684 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-10940X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,450 vs 1,040, a 32.9% lead for the Core i9-10940X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 9,000 (20% advantage for the Core i9-10940X). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10940X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 27,684 | 27,487 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,450+39% | 1,040 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000+22% | 9,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10940X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10940X versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — the Core i9-10940X supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 48 (Core i9-10940X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-10940X) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X).
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933+10% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 64+33% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-10940X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10940X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). Primary use case: Core i9-10940X targets High-End Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Desktop | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10940X was priced at $784, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X came in at $999. On launch pricing ($784 vs $999), Core i9-10940X was $215 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10940X delivers 35.3 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — making the Core i9-10940X the 24.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10940X | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $784-22% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.3+28% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














