Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-11900F

8 / 16

22,052

0.0%

22,132

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900F

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,052 vs 22,132).
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than Core i9-11900F?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-11900F is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP7/FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900F

The Core i9-11900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,052 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-11900F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-11900F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i9-11900F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900F scores 22,052 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.

Feature	Core i9-11900F	Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+2%	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4.3 GHz+72%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Phoenix (Zen4) (2023)
PassMark	22,052	22,132

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.