Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-11900F

8 / 16

22,052

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

12 / 24

22,066

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11900F

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,052 vs 22,066).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11900F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $799 MSRP, while Core i9-11900F mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11900F better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-11900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11900F is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-11900F comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you a 17.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11900F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-11900F vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900F

The Core i9-11900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 22,052 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11900F packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-11900F versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 29.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-11900F uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900F scores 22,052 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900F vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Core i9-11900F	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+34%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	3.2 GHz+28%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	32 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Rocket Lake (2021)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,052	22,066

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11900F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.