Core i9-12900
EPYC 4364P
Core i9-12900 vs EPYC 4364P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900 vs EPYC 4364P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900 vs EPYC 4364P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4364P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,695 vs 34,215).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4364P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 64.9 vs 85.8 PassMark/$ ($519 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
EPYC 4364P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $519 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 85.8 vs 64.9 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $519 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4364P better than Core i9-12900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900 vs EPYC 4364P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-12900
The Core i9-12900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,695 points. Launch price was $489.
EPYC 4364P
The EPYC 4364P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,215 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 4364P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-12900 versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4364P — a 5.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4364P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i9-12900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4364P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900 scores 33,695 against the EPYC 4364P's 34,215 — a 1.5% lead for the EPYC 4364P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4364P.
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+88% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 33,695 | 34,215+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,085 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,594 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4364P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i9-12900 versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4364P — the EPYC 4364P supports 8.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4364P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900) vs 28 (EPYC 4364P) — the EPYC 4364P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i9-12900) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4364P).
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | DDR5-5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4364P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4364P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12900) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4364P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4364P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900 rivals Ryzen 9 5900; EPYC 4364P rivals Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | Entry Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-12900 was priced at $519, while the EPYC 4364P came in at $399. On launch pricing ($519 vs $399), EPYC 4364P was $120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900 delivers 64.9 pts/$ vs 85.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 4364P — making the EPYC 4364P the 27.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | EPYC 4364P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $519 | $399-23% |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.9 | 85.8+32% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-12900 and EPYC 4364P
