
Core i9-12900

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Core i9-12900 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $630 less on MSRP ($519 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 123.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 64.9 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($519 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β +113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (33,455 vs 33,695).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 64.9 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $519 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900 better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900
The Core i9-12900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,695 points. Launch price was $489.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900 packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Core i9-12900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-12900 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β a 17% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-12900 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900 scores 33,695 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 β a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-12900. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+19% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 33,695 | 33,455 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i9-12900 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β the Core i9-12900 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-12900) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i9-12900) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). The Core i9-12900 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900 rivals Ryzen 9 5900; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-12900 was priced at $519, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX came in at $1149. On launch pricing ($519 vs $1149), Core i9-12900 was $630 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900 delivers 64.9 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β making the Core i9-12900 the 76.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $519-55% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.9+123% | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














