Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 4345P

Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 4345P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-12900F

16 / 24

35,873

0.0%

36,006

+0.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350

Ryzen 7 5800XT

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 4345P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 4345P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-12900F

2022

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4345P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,873 vs 36,006).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4345P, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 109.4 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4345P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4345P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅Costs $165 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅Delivers 50.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.4 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4345P better than Core i9-12900F?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4345P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-12900F is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4345P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4345P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4345P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4345P comes in $165 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $494 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 50.7% better value on MSRP (109.4 vs 72.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4345P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-12900F vs EPYC 4345P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900F

The Core i9-12900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,873 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 4345P

The EPYC 4345P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 36,006 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 4345P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-12900F versus 5.5 GHz on the EPYC 4345P — a 7.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4345P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-12900F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4345P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900F scores 35,873 against the EPYC 4345P's 36,006 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 4345P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900F vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4345P.

Feature	Core i9-12900F	EPYC 4345P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.5 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+58%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Grado (2025)
PassMark	35,873	36,006

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4345P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i9-12900F versus 5600 on the EPYC 4345P — the EPYC 4345P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900F) vs 28 (EPYC 4345P) — the EPYC 4345P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i9-12900F) and AM5 (EPYC 4345P).

Feature	Core i9-12900F	EPYC 4345P
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	128	128
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	28+40%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4345P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900F) vs AMD-V, IOMMU (EPYC 4345P). The EPYC 4345P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Core i9-12900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900F rivals Ryzen 9 5900X; EPYC 4345P rivals Xeon E-2488.

Feature	Core i9-12900F	EPYC 4345P
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	AMD Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, IOMMU

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-12900F was priced at $494, while the EPYC 4345P came in at $329. On launch pricing ($494 vs $329), EPYC 4345P was $165 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900F delivers 72.6 pts/$ vs 109.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4345P — making the EPYC 4345P the 40.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-12900F	EPYC 4345P
MSRP	$494	$329-33%
Performance per Dollar	72.6	109.4+51%
Release Date	2022	2025

Search Core i9-12900F on Amazon

Search EPYC 4345P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.