Core i9-13900 vs Core i9-14900

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900 vs Core i9-14900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900 vs Core i9-14900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,252 vs 45,321).
❌
4.8% HIGHER MSRP
$549 MSRPvs$524 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900.

Core i9-14900

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13900.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900 better than Core i9-13900?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-13900 is ahead with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900 is the better buy right now. Core i9-14900 comes in $25 cheaper on MSRP at $524 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-13900 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 4.9% better value on MSRP (86.5 vs 82.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900 vs Core i9-14900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900

The Core i9-13900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,252 points. Launch price was $549.

Core i9-14900

The Core i9-14900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,321 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-13900 and Core i9-14900 share an identical 24-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900 versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900 — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-13900 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-14900 uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900 scores 45,252 against the Core i9-14900's 45,321 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i9-14900. Both processors carry 36 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i9-13900	Core i9-14900
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	24 / 32
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz	5.6 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	36 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	45,252	45,321
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	36,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	3,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	20,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 5600 memory speed. The Core i9-14900 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900) and H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i9-14900).

Feature	Core i9-13900	Core i9-14900
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	5600	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900) and UHD 770 (Core i9-14900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core i9-14900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900.

Feature	Core i9-13900	Core i9-14900
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	UHD 770
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Enthusiast

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900 was priced at $549, while the Core i9-14900 came in at $524. On launch pricing ($549 vs $524), Core i9-14900 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900 delivers 82.4 pts/$ vs 86.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900 — making the Core i9-14900 the 4.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900	Core i9-14900
MSRP	$549	$524-5%
Performance per Dollar	82.4	86.5+5%
Release Date	2023	2024

Search Core i9-13900 on Amazon

Search Core i9-14900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.