Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 8224P

CPU

GPU

Core i9-13900

24 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 8224P

24 Cores48 Thrd160 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

EPYC family

····

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 8224P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900

24 / 32

45,252

0.0%

45,421

+0.4%

Ryzen 5 8600G

Ryzen 9 8945H

Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 8224P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 8224P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $306 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Delivers 55.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.4 vs 53.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $855 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 160W, a 35W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 8224P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,252 vs 45,421).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8224P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 8224P

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅380% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.1 vs 82.4 PassMark/$ ($855 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌28% higher power demand at 160W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900 better than EPYC 8224P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 8224P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8224P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900 is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900 comes in $306 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $855 MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 8224P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 55.2% better value on MSRP (82.4 vs 53.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8224P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 24/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 8224P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900

The Core i9-13900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,252 points. Launch price was $549.

EPYC 8224P

The EPYC 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,421 points. Launch price was $855.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900 packs 24 cores / 32 threads, matching the EPYC 8224P's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8224P — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Core i9-13900 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900 scores 45,252 against the EPYC 8224P's 45,421 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 8224P. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 8224P.

Feature	Core i9-13900	EPYC 8224P
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	24 / 48
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+83%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.55 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,252	45,421

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8224P — the Core i9-13900 supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8224P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 128 — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900) vs 6 (EPYC 8224P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900) vs 96 (EPYC 8224P) — the EPYC 8224P offers 76 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900) and SP6 (EPYC 8224P).

Feature	Core i9-13900	EPYC 8224P
Socket	LGA1700	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	128	1152+800%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	96+380%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8224P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 8224P). The Core i9-13900 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 8224P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	Core i9-13900	EPYC 8224P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900 was priced at $549, while the EPYC 8224P came in at $855. On launch pricing ($549 vs $855), Core i9-13900 was $306 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900 delivers 82.4 pts/$ vs 53.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8224P — making the Core i9-13900 the 43.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900	EPYC 8224P
MSRP	$549-36%	$855
Performance per Dollar	82.4+55%	53.1
Release Date	2023	2023

Search Core i9-13900 on Amazon

Search EPYC 8224P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.