Core i9-13900
EPYC 7402P
Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 7402P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 7402P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 7402P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $731 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 141.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.4 vs 34.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,280 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 7402P
2019Why buy it
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,759 vs 45,252).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.2 vs 82.4 PassMark/$ ($1,280 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900 better than EPYC 7402P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900 vs EPYC 7402P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-13900
The Core i9-13900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,252 points. Launch price was $549.
EPYC 7402P
The EPYC 7402P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,759 points. Launch price was $1,250.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900 packs 24 cores / 32 threads, matching the EPYC 7402P's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402P — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7402P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900 scores 45,252 against the EPYC 7402P's 43,759 — a 3.4% lead for the Core i9-13900. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402P.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+64% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 45,252+3% | 43,759 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7402P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7402P — the Core i9-13900 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900) vs 8 (EPYC 7402P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900) vs 128 (EPYC 7402P) — the EPYC 7402P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900) and SP3 (EPYC 7402P).
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7402P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7402P). The Core i9-13900 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7402P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; EPYC 7402P rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900 was priced at $549, while the EPYC 7402P came in at $1280. On launch pricing ($549 vs $1280), Core i9-13900 was $731 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900 delivers 82.4 pts/$ vs 34.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402P — making the Core i9-13900 the 82.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | EPYC 7402P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-57% | $1280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.4+141% | 34.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13900 and EPYC 7402P
