
Core i9-13900

M4 Max (16 cores)
Core i9-13900 vs M4 Max (16 cores) Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900 vs M4 Max (16 cores) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900 vs M4 Max (16 cores): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $549 MSRP, while M4 Max (16 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3025% higher power demand at 125W vs 4W.
M4 Max (16 cores)
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 125W, a 121W reduction.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,985 vs 45,252).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900 better than M4 Max (16 cores)?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900 vs M4 Max (16 cores) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900
The Core i9-13900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,252 points. Launch price was $549.
M4 Max (16 cores)
The M4 Max (16 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 43,985 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900 packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900 versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Max (16 cores) — a 19.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.75 GHz). The Core i9-13900 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-13900 scores 45,252 against the M4 Max (16 cores)'s 43,985 — a 2.8% lead for the Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | M4 Max (16 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+22% | 4.51 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.75 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | — |
| PassMark | 45,252+3% | 43,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 4,060 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,675 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Max (16 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 5600 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900) vs 8 (M4 Max (16 cores)). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900) vs 40 (M4 Max (16 cores)) — the M4 Max (16 cores) offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900) and Apple Silicon (M4 Max (16 cores)).
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | M4 Max (16 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600 | Unified Memory |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 40+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Max (16 cores)). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900) and Apple 40-core GPU (M4 Max (16 cores)) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M4 Max (16 cores) targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; M4 Max (16 cores) rivals Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | M4 Max (16 cores) |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Apple 40-core GPU |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Apple Virtualization |
| Target Use | — | Professional Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














