
Core i9-13900

Xeon Silver 4416+
Core i9-13900 vs Xeon Silver 4416+ Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900 vs Xeon Silver 4416+ FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900 vs Xeon Silver 4416+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $637 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,186 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 121.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.4 vs 37.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,186 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 165W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Silver 4416+ needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4416+, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4416+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (44,140 vs 45,252).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.2 vs 82.4 PassMark/$ ($1,186 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌32% higher power demand at 165W vs 125W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900 better than Xeon Silver 4416+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900 vs Xeon Silver 4416+ Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900
The Core i9-13900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,252 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon Silver 4416+
The Xeon Silver 4416+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 44,140 points. Launch price was $1,186.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900 packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4416+ offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Core i9-13900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13900 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4416+ — a 34% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900 (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-13900 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900 scores 45,252 against the Xeon Silver 4416+'s 44,140 — a 2.5% lead for the Core i9-13900. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900 vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon Silver 4416+.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Xeon Silver 4416+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+20% | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+41% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 37.5 MB+4% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 45,252+3% | 44,140 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900 versus 4800 on the Xeon Silver 4416+ — the Core i9-13900 supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4416+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4416+). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4416+) — the Xeon Silver 4416+ offers 60 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4416+).
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Xeon Silver 4416+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+17% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 80+300% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Silver 4416+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13900 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Silver 4416+ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Silver 4416+ rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Xeon Silver 4416+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900 was priced at $549, while the Xeon Silver 4416+ came in at $1186. On launch pricing ($549 vs $1186), Core i9-13900 was $637 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900 delivers 82.4 pts/$ vs 37.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4416+ — making the Core i9-13900 the 75.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900 | Xeon Silver 4416+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-54% | $1186 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.4+122% | 37.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















