Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Core i9-13900HK

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900HK

14 / 20

27,217

+21.3%

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900HK

2023

Why buy it

✅+21.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($697 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $368 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $697 MSRP).
✅Delivers 74.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $697 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,217).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900HK moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900HK better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 3700X is ahead with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900HK pulls ahead with 21.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 3700X also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900HK is the stronger fit. You are getting 21.3% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900HK is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-13900HK comes in 111.9% more expensive on MSRP at $697 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you 21.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen 7 3700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 74.6% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 39.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900HK makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900HK vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900HK

The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 19.3% lead for the Core i9-13900HK. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+23%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.6 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	27,217+21%	22,430
Geekbench 6 Single	2,629	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i9-13900HK versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Core i9-13900HK supports 62.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i9-13900HK) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Core i9-13900HK offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i9-13900HK) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+63%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	128 GB+33%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28+17%	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core i9-13900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics 96EU	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900HK was priced at $697, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($697 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $368 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900HK delivers 39.0 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 54.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900HK	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$697	$329-53%
Performance per Dollar	39.0	68.2+75%
Release Date	2023	2019

Search Core i9-13900HK on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.