Core i9-13900T vs EPYC 9124

CPU

GPU

Core i9-13900T

24 Cores32 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 9124

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2022

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i9-13900T vs EPYC 9124 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900T

24 / 32

42,735

0.0%

43,638

+2.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900T vs EPYC 9124 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900T vs EPYC 9124: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $534 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Delivers 93.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 77.8 vs 40.3 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 200W, a 165W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while EPYC 9124 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 43,638).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9124, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 9124

2022

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.3 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌471.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900T better than EPYC 9124?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 9124 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9124 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900T is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900T comes in $534 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $1,083 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 9124 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2.1% better PassMark. It is also 93.2% better value on MSRP (77.8 vs 40.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-13900T vs EPYC 9124 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900T

The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.

EPYC 9124

The EPYC 9124 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 43,638 points. Launch price was $1,083.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9124 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 9124 — a 35.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i9-13900T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 9124 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900T scores 42,735 against the EPYC 9124's 43,638 — a 2.1% lead for the EPYC 9124. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9124.

Feature	Core i9-13900T	EPYC 9124
Cores / Threads	24 / 32+50%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+43%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3 GHz+173%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark	42,735	43,638+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,770
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	18,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9124 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900T versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9124 — the Core i9-13900T supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9124 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900T) vs 12 (EPYC 9124). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900T) vs 128 (EPYC 9124) — the EPYC 9124 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T) and SP5 (EPYC 9124).

Feature	Core i9-13900T	EPYC 9124
Socket	LGA1700	SP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6144 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	12+500%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9124). The Core i9-13900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 9124 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9124 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; EPYC 9124 rivals Xeon Gold 6426Y.

Feature	Core i9-13900T	EPYC 9124
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900T was priced at $549, while the EPYC 9124 came in at $1083. On launch pricing ($549 vs $1083), Core i9-13900T was $534 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900T delivers 77.8 pts/$ vs 40.3 pts/$ for the EPYC 9124 — making the Core i9-13900T the 63.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900T	EPYC 9124
MSRP	$549-49%	$1083
Performance per Dollar	77.8+93%	40.3
Release Date	2023	2022

Search Core i9-13900T on Amazon

Search EPYC 9124 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.