Core i9-13900T vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

Intel

Core i9-13900T

24 Cores32 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

12 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Core i9-13900T vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900T vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900T vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900T

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $51 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 8.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 77.8 vs 72.0 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • βœ…Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 43,174).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

2025

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
  • βœ…40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.0 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • ❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900T better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 390?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-13900T is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-13900T is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900T comes in $51 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 8.2% better value on MSRP (77.8 vs 72.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023), 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900T vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-13900T

The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 43,174 points. Launch price was $499.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads β€” the Core i9-13900T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 β€” a 5.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900T uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900T scores 42,735 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 43,174 β€” a 1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.

FeatureCore i9-13900TRyzen AI Max PRO 390
Cores / Threads
24 / 32+100%
12 / 24
Boost Clock
5.3 GHz+6%
5 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+191%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023βˆ’2024)
Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark
42,735
43,174+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13900T versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 β€” the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 supports 42.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 β€” 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900T) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900T) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) β€” the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390).

FeatureCore i9-13900TRyzen AI Max PRO 390
Socket
LGA1700
FP11
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600
8000+43%
Max RAM Capacity
192+50%
128
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
28+40%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900T) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390). Both include integrated graphics β€” Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13900T) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 390) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

FeatureCore i9-13900TRyzen AI Max PRO 390
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900T was priced at $549, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 came in at $600. On launch pricing ($549 vs $600), Core i9-13900T was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900T delivers 77.8 pts/$ vs 72.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 β€” making the Core i9-13900T the 7.9% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-13900TRyzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP
$549-9%
$600
Performance per Dollar
77.8+8%
72.0
Release Date
2023
2025

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.