Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-13900T

Intel

Core i7-13790F

16 Cores24 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core i9-13900T

24 Cores32 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.3 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-13900T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-13900T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-13900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13790F

2023

Why buy it

  • +1.9% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $157 less on MSRP ($392 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Delivers 42.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.1 vs 77.8 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-13900T

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i7-13790F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (42,735 vs 43,549).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 77.8 vs 111.1 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13790F better than Core i9-13900T?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-13900T is ahead with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13790F pulls ahead with 1.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13790F is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13790F is the better buy right now. Core i7-13790F comes in $157 cheaper on MSRP at $392 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.9% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-13900T is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 42.7% better value on MSRP (111.1 vs 77.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900T is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i7-13790F vs Core i9-13900T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-13790F

The Core i7-13790F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 43,549 points. Launch price was $441.

Intel

Core i9-13900T

The Core i9-13900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 42,735 points. Launch price was $549.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13790F packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-13900T offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13790F versus 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-13900T — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). Both are built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-13790F scores 43,549 against the Core i9-13900T's 42,735 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i7-13790F. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-13790F vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900T.

FeatureCore i7-13790FCore i9-13900T
Cores / Threads
16 / 24
24 / 32+50%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz
5.3 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+91%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
33 MB (total)
36 MB (total)+9%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
43,549+2%
42,735
Cinebench R23 Multi
26,247
Geekbench 6 Single
2,815
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,673
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-13790F) vs 20 (Core i9-13900T) — the Core i9-13900T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13790F) and Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13900T).

FeatureCore i7-13790FCore i9-13900T
Socket
LGA1700
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i7-13790F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900T rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.

FeatureCore i7-13790FCore i9-13900T
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13790F was priced at $392, while the Core i9-13900T came in at $549. On launch pricing ($392 vs $549), Core i7-13790F was $157 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13790F delivers 111.1 pts/$ vs 77.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-13900T — making the Core i7-13790F the 35.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-13790FCore i9-13900T
MSRP
$392-29%
$549
Performance per Dollar
111.1+43%
77.8
Release Date
2023
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.