
Core i9-13980HX
Popular choices:

Core i9-14900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13980HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 86.5 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900.
Core i9-14900
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.5 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13980HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13980HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,321 vs 45,950).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Core i9-13980HX
2023Core i9-14900
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.5 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-13980HX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 86.5 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13980HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,321 vs 45,950).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13980HX better than Core i9-14900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 313 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 180 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 465 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 334 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 990 FPS |
| medium | 905 FPS | 886 FPS |
| high | 792 FPS | 774 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 688 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 821 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 421 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13980HX and Core i9-14900

Core i9-13980HX
Core i9-13980HX
The Core i9-13980HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,950 points. Launch price was $668.

Core i9-14900
Core i9-14900
The Core i9-14900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,321 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-13980HX and Core i9-14900 share an identical 24-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13980HX versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900 — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-13980HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-14900 uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13980HX scores 45,950 against the Core i9-14900's 45,321 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i9-13980HX. Both processors carry 36 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 24 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,950+1% | 45,321 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 36,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13980HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-14900 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13980HX versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900 — the Core i9-13980HX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13980HX) and H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i9-14900).
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 192 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13980HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-13980HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13980HX) and UHD 770 (Core i9-14900) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core i9-13980HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Core i9-14900 rivals Ryzen 9 7900.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | UHD 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Enthusiast |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13980HX launched at $668 MSRP, while the Core i9-14900 debuted at $524. On MSRP ($668 vs $524), the Core i9-14900 is $144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13980HX delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 86.5 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900 — making the Core i9-14900 the 22.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668 | $524-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.8 | 86.5+26% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













