Core i9-13980HX
VS
EPYC 73F3

Core i9-13980HX vs EPYC 73F3

Intel

Core i9-13980HX

24 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13980HX

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
118%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
110%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
100%
#37
Core i9-13980HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
96%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 73F3

#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
108%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
106%
#434
Xeon W-3225
MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850
106%
#435
Xeon Gold 6354
MSRP: $2878|Avg: $2898
105%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
104%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
104%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
104%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
103%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
102%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
102%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
102%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
101%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
101%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
100%
#446
Xeon Gold 5117
MSRP: $1286|Avg: $300
100%
#447
EPYC 73F3
MSRP: $3521|Avg: $2100
100%
#448
EPYC 9384X
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $4157
100%
#449
EPYC 8534P
MSRP: $5529|Avg: $5529
99%
#450
EPYC 7663
MSRP: $6366|Avg: $6366
99%
#450
EPYC 9565
MSRP: $10486|Avg: $8233
99%
#452
EPYC 9755
MSRP: $12984|Avg: $10931
98%
#454
Xeon Platinum 8368
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $429
97%
#456
EPYC 9575F
MSRP: $11791|Avg: $9238
96%
#457
EPYC 7642
MSRP: $4775|Avg: $850
95%
#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
95%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
94%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
92%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
92%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($2,100) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 73F3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i9-13980HXEPYC 73F3
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i9-13980HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($2,100 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i9-13980HXEPYC 73F3
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($2,100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13980HX and EPYC 73F3

Intel

Core i9-13980HX

The Core i9-13980HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,950 points. Launch price was $668.

AMD

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13980HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 73F3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13980HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13980HX versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13980HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-13980HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i9-13980HX scores 45,950 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13980HX vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.

FeatureCore i9-13980HXEPYC 73F3
Cores / Threads
24 / 32+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.5 GHz+38%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+59%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
256 MB (total)+611%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm+
Architecture
Raptor Lake-HX (2023)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
45,950
46,103
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13980HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13980HX versus 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 — the Core i9-13980HX supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13980HX) vs 8 (EPYC 73F3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13980HX) vs 128 (EPYC 73F3) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13980HX) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).

FeatureCore i9-13980HXEPYC 73F3
Socket
FCBGA1964
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
5600+75%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
192
4096+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13980HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13980HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 73F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13980HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

FeatureCore i9-13980HXEPYC 73F3
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d