Core i9-13980HX vs Xeon W-3175X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13980HX vs Xeon W-3175X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13980HX vs Xeon W-3175X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13980HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,331 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 347.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 255W, a 200W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,950 vs 46,125).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3175X, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3175X

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13980HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
❌363.6% higher power demand at 255W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-13980HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13980HX better than Xeon W-3175X?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3175X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13980HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3175X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13980HX is the better buy right now. Core i9-13980HX comes in $2,331 cheaper on MSRP at $668 MSRP versus $2,999 MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3175X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 347.2% better value on MSRP (68.8 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13980HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13980HX vs Xeon W-3175X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13980HX

The Core i9-13980HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,950 points. Launch price was $668.

Xeon W-3175X

The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13980HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13980HX versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X — a 36.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-13980HX (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i9-13980HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3175X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13980HX scores 45,950 against the Xeon W-3175X's 46,125 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon W-3175X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13980HX vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X.

Feature	Core i9-13980HX	Xeon W-3175X
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock	5.5 GHz+45%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3.1 GHz+41%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	38.5 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	45,950	46,125
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	31,350
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,467
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,358

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13980HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3175X uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13980HX versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X — the Core i9-13980HX supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13980HX) vs 6 (Xeon W-3175X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13980HX) vs 48 (Xeon W-3175X) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13980HX) and Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X).

Feature	Core i9-13980HX	Xeon W-3175X
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	512 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13980HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Xeon W-3175X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13980HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.

Feature	Core i9-13980HX	Xeon W-3175X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13980HX was priced at $668, while the Xeon W-3175X came in at $2999. On launch pricing ($668 vs $2999), Core i9-13980HX was $2331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13980HX delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3175X — making the Core i9-13980HX the 126.9% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13980HX	Xeon W-3175X
MSRP	$668-78%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	68.8+347%	15.4
Release Date	2023	2018

Search Core i9-13980HX on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3175X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.