
Core i9-13980HX

Core i9-14900F
Core i9-13980HX vs Core i9-14900F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13980HX vs Core i9-14900F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13980HX vs Core i9-14900F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13980HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Core i9-14900F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,950 vs 46,825).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 89.4 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $524 MSRP).
Core i9-14900F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($524 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.4 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($524 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13980HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13980HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900F better than Core i9-13980HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13980HX vs Core i9-14900F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13980HX
The Core i9-13980HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,950 points. Launch price was $668.

Core i9-14900F
The Core i9-14900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,825 points. Launch price was $524.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-13980HX and Core i9-14900F share an identical 24-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13980HX versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14900F — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900F (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i9-13980HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-14900F uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13980HX scores 45,950 against the Core i9-14900F's 46,825 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i9-14900F. Both processors carry 36 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 24 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.6 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+10% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,950 | 46,825+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 33,820 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13980HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-14900F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 5600 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13980HX) and LGA1700 (Core i9-14900F).
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-13980HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-13980HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Core i9-14900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13980HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13980HX was priced at $668, while the Core i9-14900F came in at $524. On launch pricing ($668 vs $524), Core i9-14900F was $144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13980HX delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 89.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-14900F — making the Core i9-14900F the 26% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668 | $524-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.8 | 89.4+30% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















