Core i9-14900K
EPYC 7473X
Core i9-14900K vs EPYC 7473X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-14900K vs EPYC 7473X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-14900K vs EPYC 7473X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-14900K
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +15.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,311 less on MSRP ($589 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 553.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 99.4 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 240W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,544 vs 59,280).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7473X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7473X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+2033.3% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 99.4 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ❌92% higher power demand at 240W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900K better than EPYC 7473X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-14900K vs EPYC 7473X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-14900K
The Core i9-14900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,544 points. Launch price was $589.
EPYC 7473X
The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900K packs 24 cores / 32 threads, matching the EPYC 7473X's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-14900K versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X — a 44.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-14900K uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7473X uses Milan-X (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900K scores 58,544 against the EPYC 7473X's 59,280 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900K vs 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X.
| Feature | Core i9-14900K | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+57% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+14% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 768 MB (total)+2033% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Milan-X (2022) |
| PassMark | 58,544 | 59,280+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7473X uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900K versus 3200 on the EPYC 7473X — the Core i9-14900K supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7473X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900K) vs 8 (EPYC 7473X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900K) vs 128 (EPYC 7473X) — the EPYC 7473X offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,Z690 (Core i9-14900K) and SP3 (EPYC 7473X).
| Feature | Core i9-14900K | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-14900K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i9-14900K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7473X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900K rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Core i9-14900K | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-14900K was priced at $589, while the EPYC 7473X came in at $3900. On launch pricing ($589 vs $3900), Core i9-14900K was $3311 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900K delivers 99.4 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7473X — making the Core i9-14900K the 146.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900K | EPYC 7473X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589-85% | $3900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.4+554% | 15.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-14900K and EPYC 7473X
