PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14900K vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14900K vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14900K

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,362 less on MSRP ($589 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 732.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 99.4 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (58,544 vs 59,091).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 99.4 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14900K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900K better than Xeon W-3375?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3375 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-14900K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3375 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14900K is the better buy right now. Core i9-14900K comes in $4,362 cheaper on MSRP at $589 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it still gives you a 21.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3375 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 732.8% better value on MSRP (99.4 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14900K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14900K vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900K

The Core i9-14900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 58,544 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900K packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-14900K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-14900K uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900K scores 58,544 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-3375. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900K vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	Core i9-14900K	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	38 / 76+58%
Boost Clock	5.8 GHz+45%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+28%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+58%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	58,544	59,091
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,713

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900K versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Core i9-14900K supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900K) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900K) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,Z690 (Core i9-14900K) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	Core i9-14900K	Xeon W-3375
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-14900K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900K) vs true (Xeon W-3375). The Core i9-14900K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900K rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Core i9-14900K	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-14900K was priced at $589, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($589 vs $4951), Core i9-14900K was $4362 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900K delivers 99.4 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Core i9-14900K the 157.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-14900K	Xeon W-3375
MSRP	$589-88%	$4951
Performance per Dollar	99.4+735%	11.9
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Core i9-14900K on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.