Core i9-14900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285HX

Intel

Core i9-14900KF

24 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.8 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 285HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.5 GHz2025
Core Ultra family
·······

Core i9-14900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285HX Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285HX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14900KF

2023

Why buy it

  • +7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $564 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 285HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core Ultra 9 285HX

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.
  • 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Graphics, while Core i9-14900KF needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (3,106 vs 3,322).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (22,200 vs 23,051).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14900KF better than Core Ultra 9 285HX?
Yes. Core i9-14900KF is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.8% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14900KF is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14900KF is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-14900KF is the better buy right now. Core i9-14900KF comes in at an unclear MSRP at $564 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (103.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14900KF vs Core Ultra 9 285HX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-14900KF

The Core i9-14900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 58,333 points. Launch price was $564.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285HX

The Core Ultra 9 285HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,732 points. Launch price was $650.

Processing Power

The Core i9-14900KF packs 24 cores / 32 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 285HX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-14900KF versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285HX — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900KF (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-14900KF uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900KF scores 58,333 against the Core Ultra 9 285HX's 58,732 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,322 vs 3,106, a 6.7% lead for the Core i9-14900KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,051 vs 22,200 (3.8% advantage for the Core i9-14900KF). Both processors carry 36 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i9-14900KFCore Ultra 9 285HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 32
24 / 24
Boost Clock
5.8 GHz+5%
5.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+14%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+50%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
PassMark
58,333
58,732
Cinebench R23 Multi
42,000
Geekbench 6 Single
3,322+7%
3,106
Geekbench 6 Multi
23,051+4%
22,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14900KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900KF versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285HX — the Core Ultra 9 285HX supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900KF) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 285HX) — the Core Ultra 9 285HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel B760 (Core i9-14900KF) and Intel HM870 (Core Ultra 9 285HX).

FeatureCore i9-14900KFCore Ultra 9 285HX
Socket
LGA1700
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
DDR5-6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
24+20%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 285HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Core i9-14900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900KF rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Core Ultra 9 285HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

FeatureCore i9-14900KFCore Ultra 9 285HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true