
Core i9-14900KF

Xeon W-3375
Core i9-14900KF vs Xeon W-3375 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-14900KF vs Xeon W-3375 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-14900KF vs Xeon W-3375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-14900KF
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,387 less on MSRP ($564 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 766.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.4 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($564 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon W-3375
2021Why buy it
- ✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,713 vs 23,051).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 103.4 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $564 MSRP).
- ❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i9-14900KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14900KF better than Xeon W-3375?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-14900KF vs Xeon W-3375 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14900KF
The Core i9-14900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 58,333 points. Launch price was $564.

Xeon W-3375
The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900KF packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-14900KF versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-14900KF (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-14900KF uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900KF scores 58,333 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon W-3375. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,322 vs 1,818, a 58.5% lead for the Core i9-14900KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 23,051 vs 17,713 (26.2% advantage for the Core i9-14900KF). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900KF vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KF | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32 | 38 / 76+58% |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+45% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 57 MB (total)+58% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 58,333 | 59,091+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 42,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,322+83% | 1,818 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 23,051+30% | 17,713 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14900KF versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Core i9-14900KF supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14900KF) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900KF) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel B760 (Core i9-14900KF) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).
| Feature | Core i9-14900KF | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-14900KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900KF rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KF | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-14900KF was priced at $564, while the Xeon W-3375 came in at $4951. On launch pricing ($564 vs $4951), Core i9-14900KF was $4387 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900KF delivers 103.4 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Core i9-14900KF the 158.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900KF | Xeon W-3375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $564-89% | $4951 |
| Performance per Dollar | 103.4+769% | 11.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















