
Core i9-7960X

Xeon W-3323
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-3323 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-3323 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-3323: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-7960X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3323 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.5 vs 29.3 PassMark/$ ($1,699 MSRP vs $949 MSRP).
Xeon W-3323
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($949 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 29.3 vs 16.5 PassMark/$ ($949 MSRP vs $1,699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,822 vs 28,020).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3323 better than Core i9-7960X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-7960X vs Xeon W-3323 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-7960X
The Core i9-7960X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,020 points. Launch price was $1,699.

Xeon W-3323
The Xeon W-3323 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 220 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,822 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-7960X packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3323 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-7960X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7960X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon W-3323 — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i9-7960X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-7960X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3323 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-7960X scores 28,020 against the Xeon W-3323's 27,822 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-7960X. L3 cache: 22 MB (total) on the Core i9-7960X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3323.
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB (total)+22% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 28,020 | 27,822 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 22,189 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,394 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-7960X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3323 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i9-7960X) / not specified (Xeon W-3323).
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-7960X was priced at $1699, while the Xeon W-3323 came in at $949. On launch pricing ($1699 vs $949), Xeon W-3323 was $750 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7960X delivers 16.5 pts/$ vs 29.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3323 — making the Xeon W-3323 the 56% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7960X | Xeon W-3323 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1699 | $949-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.5 | 29.3+78% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















