Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon D-1567

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon D-1567 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon D-1567: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-8950HK

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,447).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1567, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon D-1567

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-8950HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,702 MSRP, while Core i9-8950HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-8950HK better than Xeon D-1567?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1567 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-8950HK is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1567 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-8950HK is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i9-8950HK comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon D-1567 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 11.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-8950HK makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016) and 700% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 1.5 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon D-1567 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-8950HK

The Core i9-8950HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,373 points. Launch price was $583.

Xeon D-1567

The Xeon D-1567 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (per core). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 10,447 points. Launch price was $1,069.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-8950HK packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1567 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-1567 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-8950HK versus 2.7 GHz on the Xeon D-1567 — a 56% clock advantage for the Core i9-8950HK (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i9-8950HK uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-1567 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-8950HK scores 10,373 against the Xeon D-1567's 10,447 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon D-1567. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i9-8950HK vs 1.5 MB (per core) on the Xeon D-1567.

Feature	Core i9-8950HK	Xeon D-1567
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+78%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+38%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+700%	1.5 MB (per core)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	10,373	10,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-8950HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1567 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.