Core i7-1195G7 vs Core i9-8950HK

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1195G7 vs Core i9-8950HK FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1195G7 vs Core i9-8950HK: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1195G7

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i9-8950HK needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i9-8950HK

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1195G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,472).
❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1195G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1195G7 better than Core i9-8950HK?

Yes. Core i7-1195G7 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1195G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1195G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1195G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1195G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1195G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-1195G7 vs Core i9-8950HK Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1195G7

The Core i7-1195G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,472 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i9-8950HK

The Core i9-8950HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,373 points. Launch price was $583.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1195G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-8950HK offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-8950HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-1195G7 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-8950HK — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1195G7 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-1195G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i9-8950HK uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1195G7 scores 10,472 against the Core i9-8950HK's 10,373 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-1195G7. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-1195G7	Core i9-8950HK
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+20380%
Process	10 nm SuperFin-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark	10,472	10,373
Cinebench R23 Multi	6,806	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,930	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,426	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1195G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-8950HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1195G7	Core i9-8950HK
Socket	FCBGA1449	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1195G7) / not specified (Core i9-8950HK). The Core i7-1195G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core i9-8950HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1195G7 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-1195G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5700U.