
Core i7-1195G7
Popular choices:

Core i9-8950HK
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1195G7
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i9-8950HK needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-8950HK
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,472).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1195G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-1195G7
2021Core i9-8950HK
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU), while Core i9-8950HK needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,472).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-1195G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1195G7 better than Core i9-8950HK?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 200 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 259 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1195G7 and Core i9-8950HK

Core i7-1195G7
Core i7-1195G7
The Core i7-1195G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,472 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i9-8950HK
Core i9-8950HK
The Core i9-8950HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,373 points. Launch price was $583.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1195G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-8950HK offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-8950HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-1195G7 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-8950HK — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1195G7 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-1195G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i9-8950HK uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1195G7 scores 10,472 against the Core i9-8950HK's 10,373 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-1195G7. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+4% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,472 | 10,373 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 6,806 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,930 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,426 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1195G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-8950HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1449 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1195G7) / not specified (Core i9-8950HK). The Core i7-1195G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU)), while the Core i9-8950HK requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1195G7 targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-1195G7 rivals Ryzen 7 5700U.
| Feature | Core i7-1195G7 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96 EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












